TL;DR

SWE-CI introduces a benchmark to evaluate AI agents on their ability to maintain real software codebases through continuous integration workflows, moving beyond isolated bug-fixing to test realistic repository maintenance scenarios.

Summary

Real-world software maintenance requires agents to navigate interconnected CI/CD pipelines, understand multi-step task dependencies, and handle cascading effects across repository states—challenges beyond fixing isolated bugs. SWE-CI addresses this gap by creating a comprehensive benchmark that simulates authentic development workflows where agents must understand CI pipeline failures, implement fixes while preserving codebase integrity, and handle repository-wide maintenance tasks. The evaluation reveals current agent capabilities and limitations when facing practical, multi-step software engineering challenges within production-like CI contexts.

Key contributions

  1. Introduces SWE-CI benchmark, extending agent evaluation beyond isolated problem-solving to realistic continuous integration scenarios with interdependent maintenance tasks.
  2. Creates comprehensive dataset encompassing diverse codebase maintenance scenarios that reflect real-world development challenges and CI/CD pipeline failures.
  3. Provides empirical evaluation framework demonstrating how different AI agent architectures perform on interconnected repository maintenance tasks within CI environments.
  4. Demonstrates the gap between single-task fixing and realistic multi-step workflow execution, highlighting areas where agents struggle with task dependencies and code integrity preservation.

When to cite

  1. When evaluating how well AI agents can handle realistic software development workflows versus isolated bug-fixing benchmarks.
  2. When designing benchmarks or evaluation frameworks for code generation and automated software maintenance within CI/CD systems.
  3. When discussing the limitations of current agents in handling interdependent, multi-step software engineering tasks in production environments.
  4. When analyzing what capabilities language models need to effectively participate in full development lifecycle workflows, not just code completion.

AI Agents DevOps Generative AI LLM